Developing Peer Tutoring Digital Notes with See, Think, Wonder Thinking Routine
Abstract
Slow learner struggles in their academics. Peer tutoring has been identified as an effective learning strategy for slow learner and yet specific peer tutoring strategy for slow learner hasn’t been developed much. See-Think-Wonder (STW) is a thinking habit that emphasizes the value of inquiry-based thinking through a three steps procedure attentive observation, see, think and wonder. STW has been applied successfully applied in classroom and can be good for peer tutoring activities. To achieve good peer tutoring result, it can be facilitated through note taking. Note taking can help learners to process, organize and understand what is being learnt and students who are write better notes in general are higher achievers. The study uses design approach and tries to apply see, think, wonder as note taking strategies for slow learner during peer tutoring. The study result is a website application named Pelitaku. It has three main functions for slow learners: find peer tutors, book a tutor session, and create digital notes while peer tutoring. The digital notes have three features. The reminder feature is intended to help slow learner’s lack of attention, while the tips feature is intended to help with slow learner’s inability to connect disparate pieces of information and slow learner’s lack of curiosity
Downloads
References
[2] R. A. Suranjana, R. Ujjani, and R. M. Kanti, “Peer tutoring as a remedial measure for slow learners in a medical school,” J. Krishna Inst. Med. Sci. Univ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 130–134, 2015.
[3] S. Y. Giawa, “Strategi Pembelajaran Anak Lamban Belajar ( Slow Learner ) Di Sd Inklusi Sdn ‘ Suka Menolong ’ Yogyakarta,” Skripsi, pp. 1–277, 2017.
[4] K. Dasaradhi, M. Mandal, K. Dt, H. Mentor, and G. Wing, “30 Methods to Improve Learning Capability in Slow Learners Sriharipuram,” Int. J. English Laguage, Litreture Humanit., vol. 4, pp. 556–570, 2016, [Online]. Available: www.ijellh.com.
[5] W. Amelia, “Karakteristik dan Jenis Kesulitan Belajar Anak Slow Learner,” J. Aisyah J. Ilmu Kesehat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–58, 2016, doi: 10.30604/jika.v1i2.21.
[6] S. Y. Giawa et al., “STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN ANAK LAMBAN BELAJAR ( SLOW LEARNER ) DI SD INKLUSI SDN ‘ SUKA MENOLONG ’ YOGYAKARTA,” 2017.
[7] M. Purwatiningtyas, “Strategi Pembelajaran Anak Lamban Belajar di Sekolah Inklusi SD Negeri Giwangan Yogyakarta,” 2014.
[8] L. A. Rosdiana, “Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Slow Learner dalam Menyimak Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia,” Literasi J. Ilm. Pendidik. Bhs. Sastra Indones. dan Drh., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2017.
[9] N. Grubbs, “The Effects of the Peer Tutoring Program An Action Research Study of the Effectiveness of the Peer Tutoring Program at One Suburban Middle School The Effects of the Peer Tutoring Program,” vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2009.
[10] M. Sangeeta Chauhan, “Slow Learners: Their Psychology and Educational Programmes,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 279–289, 2011, [Online]. Available: www.zenithresearch.org.in.
[11] Subagya, R. Karsidi, M. Yusuf, and J. Yuwono, “Panduan Layanan Mahasiswa Disabilitas Di Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta,” no. June, p. 49, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342199063_Panduan_Layanan_Mahasiswa_Disabilitas_Di_Universitas_Sebelas_Maret_Surakarta/link/5ee84569458515814a628aac/download%0A.
[12] S. Putranto and M. Marsigit, “Is it Effective using Peer Tutoring with Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Slow Learners’ Mathematics Attitudes?,” Int. J. Emerg. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 179, 2018, doi: 10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.10487.
[13] G. M. Lowe, P. Prout, and K. Murcia, “I see, i think i wonder: An evaluation of journaling as a critical reflective practice tool for aiding teachers in challenging or confronting contexts,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1–16, 2013, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n6.6.
[14] Harvard, “See, Think, Wonder | Project Zero,” 2016. http://www.pz.harvard.edu/resources/see-think-wonder (accessed Dec. 05, 2021).
[15] R. L. Williams and A. C. Eggert, “Notetaking In College Classes: Student Patterns And Instructional Strategies,” J. Gen. Educ., vol. 51, 2002.
[16] B. H. Bretzing and R. W. Kulhavy, “Notetaking and depth of processing,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 1979, doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(79)90069-9.
[17] E. M. Stacy and J. Cain, “Note-taking and Handouts in The Digital Age,” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 79, no. 7, 2015, doi: 10.5688/AJPE797107.
[18] A. D. Katayama and D. H. Robinson, “Getting students ‘partially’ involved in note-taking using graphic organizers,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 119–133, 2000, doi: 10.1080/00220970009598498.
[19] K. Kim, S. A. Turner, and M. A. Pérez-Quiñones, “Requirements for electronic note taking systems: A field study of note taking in university classrooms,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 255–283, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10639-009-9086-z.
[20] N. Pavlov, “User Interface for People with Autism Spectrum Disorders,” J. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 07, no. 02, pp. 128–134, 2014, doi: 10.4236/jsea.2014.72014.
[21] K. Moran, “Usability Testing 101,” 2019. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-101/.
Copyright (c) 2022 Devanny Gumulya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract dilihat 647 kali
FULL TEXT diunduh 386 kali
